<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LobbyingFirms.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com</link>
	<description>LobbyingFirms.com is a non partisan, comprehensive Directory of U.S. Federal, State and Grassroots Lobbyists and Lobbying Firms, lobbying industry news, information and resources.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:29:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Defense Industry Gets Defensive With Increased Lobbying Activity</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/defense-industry-gets-defensive-with-increased-lobbying-activity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/defense-industry-gets-defensive-with-increased-lobbying-activity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Foreman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/?p=700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defense sector increases lobbying amidst budget uncertainty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/FighterPlanes.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-699" title="FighterPlanes" src="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/FighterPlanes.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="136" /></a>Megan Scully of <strong>Government Executive</strong> investigates the Defense Industry&#8217;s 7% YTD rise in lobbying expenditures in the face of Pentagon warnings of fiscal belt tightening.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0810/080310cdam1.htm" target="_blank"><strong><em>Read Entire Article</em></strong></a></p>
<div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/defense-industry-gets-defensive-with-increased-lobbying-activity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPS vs. FedEx &#8211; The Labor Lobbying Battle Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/ups-vs-fedex-the-labor-lobbying-battle-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/ups-vs-fedex-the-labor-lobbying-battle-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Foreman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/?p=687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, Congress faces a deadline on a labor law provision that has had both shipping companies lobbying ferociously.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/fedex-ups.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-690" title="fedex-ups" src="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/fedex-ups.jpg" alt="" width="127" height="150" /></a>Politico&#8217;s Chris Frates details the ongoing lobbying battle that shipping giants UPS and FedEx have been waging over a proposal that would make it easier for labor to organize FedEx.  This week, Congress is scheduled to act on the provision.</p>
<div><em><strong><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/39079.html" target="_blank">Read Entire Article</a><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/39079.html#ixzz0sGSoJOrK"></a></strong></em></div>
<div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/ups-vs-fedex-the-labor-lobbying-battle-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s Low Profile Has Some Taking Note</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/apples-low-profile-has-some-taking-note/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/apples-low-profile-has-some-taking-note/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Foreman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/?p=673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Products from Apple continue to be wildly successful.  Yet, compared to other successful tech giants, their footprint in Washington is small. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/apple.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-672" title="apple" src="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/apple.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Kim Hart from Politico reports on how the high profile tech star, Apple, inc  has, thus far, kept out of the D.C. spotlight.  This, as many other superstars from Silicon Valley have an increased presence inside the Beltway.  Consider Apple’s lobbying expenditures in 2009, only $1.5 million to lobby the federal government, less than Amazon, Yahoo and IBM. Comparatively,  Google spent $4 million, Microsoft $7 million and AT&amp;T $15 million that same year.  With the popularity of Apple products growing, will it&#8217;s current position in the Capitol continue?</p>
<p><strong><em><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/38481.html" target="_blank">Read Full Article</a></em></strong></p>
<div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/apples-low-profile-has-some-taking-note/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternative Energy&#8217;s Lobbying Growth</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/alternative-energys-lobbying-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/alternative-energys-lobbying-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Foreman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/?p=664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once just a small K Street player, the alternative energy industry has grown into a formidable, influential force over the last decade.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/AltEnergy.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-666 alignleft" title="AltEnergy" src="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/AltEnergy.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Politico&#8217;s Alexandra Arkin examines the impressive growth of alternative energy&#8217;s lobbying might.   Over the past decade, the sector has increased it&#8217;s lobbying spend by twelve (12) times.  The total spend is still relatively small compared to it&#8217;s opponents from the oil industry. But the speed of the growth is noteworthy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/36172.html" target="_blank"><strong><em>Read Entire Article</em></strong></a></p>
<div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/alternative-energys-lobbying-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tension Created Between Jamaica And U.S. Amidst Lobbying Dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/tension-created-between-jamaica-and-u-s-amidst-lobbying-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/tension-created-between-jamaica-and-u-s-amidst-lobbying-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Foreman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/?p=658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A $400,000 lobbying contract between the government of Jamaica and a U.S. Based firm falls apart amid a flurry of allegations that have reverberated from Kingston to Washington.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/jamaicanFlag.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-657" title="jamaicanFlag" src="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/jamaicanFlag.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="119" /></a>Dann Eggen of the Washington Post investigates why a $400,000 contract with a U.S. Based firm, Manatt, Phelps &amp; Phillips, to lobby extradition matters on behalf of the government of Jamaica, with White House and other administration officials, has fallen apart in controversy.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/15/AR2010041503600.html" target="_blank"><em>Read Full Article</em></a></strong></p>
<div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/tension-created-between-jamaica-and-u-s-amidst-lobbying-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Behind the Google Lobby?</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/whats-behind-the-google-lobby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/whats-behind-the-google-lobby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Foreman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2009 the search giant spent $4million on lobbying, almost equal to what they spent in the year 2007 and 2008 combined...    ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Google.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-650 alignleft" title="Google" src="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Google.jpg" alt="" width="111" height="111" /></a></p>
<p>With a massive increase in it&#8217;s lobbying expenditures, Todd Spangler and John Eggerton of Multichannel News dig into what Google is searching for in D.C.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/449177-Behind_Google_s_Broadband_Strategy.php" target="_blank"><em>Read Entire Article</em></a></p>
<div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/whats-behind-the-google-lobby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is This The Future Of Lobbyist Compensation?</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/is-this-the-future-of-lobbyist-pay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/is-this-the-future-of-lobbyist-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Foreman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/?p=643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new lobbying firm plans to grow using a non-traditional way to compensate it's staff lobbyists.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/paycheck.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-642" title="paycheck" src="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/paycheck.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="113" /></a>Jim Snyder of The Hill reports on a new D.C. Lobbying firm that is using a model of compensation not traditionally used for lobbyists working at a firm.  Will this work?  Is this the Future?</p>
<p><em><a href="http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/74463-new-lobbying-firm-to-offer-entrepreneurial-model-to-grow-on-k-st" target="_blank">Read Entire Article</a></em></p>
<div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/is-this-the-future-of-lobbyist-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Defensive Lobbying&#8221;.  Don&#8217;t Let Your Clients Get Caught Sleeping</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/defensive-lobbying-dont-let-your-clients-get-caught-sleeping/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/defensive-lobbying-dont-let-your-clients-get-caught-sleeping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Foreman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/?p=633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fears of a swiftly changing environment have industries keeping their lobbying efforts in place, even if today the coast is clear. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-632" title="Defense" src="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Defense.jpg" alt="Defense" width="150" height="147" />AP&#8217;s, Julie Hirschfeld Davis, reports on the strategy of &#8220;Defensive Lobbying&#8221; and how the practice has recently been undertaken by various industries.  The article highlights several industry examples but focuses on the efforts of the trade association of the soft drink, sports and energy drinks as they have spent substantial dollars pro-actively lobbying despite the lack of immediate harmful legislation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gBBmV6OVXibwwR0LbS042rIR2_7gD9CBB5FG0" target="_blank"><strong>Read Article</strong></a></p>
<div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/defensive-lobbying-dont-let-your-clients-get-caught-sleeping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scottsdale Considers Outsourcing It&#8217;s Lobbying Efforts</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/scottsdale-considers-outsourcing-its-lobbying-efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/scottsdale-considers-outsourcing-its-lobbying-efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Foreman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona Lobbying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those in favor of the changes say it could save money and increase efficiency.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-624" title="scottsdale" src="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/scottsdale.jpg" alt="scottsdale" width="150" height="120" />Lynh Bui from the The Arizona Republic reports on the city of Scottsdale&#8217;s proposed plans to downsize it&#8217;s government relations department and outsource the work to private lobbyists.  The move is being considered in order to save money and increase the efficiency of the city&#8217;s efforts in securing state and federal benefits.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.azcentral.com/community/scottsdale/articles/2009/11/20/20091120sr-lobby1120.html" target="_blank"><strong>Read Article</strong></a></p>
<div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/scottsdale-considers-outsourcing-its-lobbying-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Lobbyists File Lawsuit To Stop Vote On Proposed Fees</title>
		<link>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/california-lobbyists-file-lawsuit-to-stop-vote-on-proposed-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/california-lobbyists-file-lawsuit-to-stop-vote-on-proposed-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Foreman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California Lobbying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/?p=614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A vote on a ballot measure scheduled for the June election could make state lobbyists the guinea pig in an experiment on campaign finance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-617" title="lawsuit" src="http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/lawsuit.jpg" alt="lawsuit" width="150" height="150" />Andy Furillo from The Sacramento Bee reports on a lawsuit filed to halt a proposed measure that would require California state lobbyists, lobbyist employers and lobbying firms to collectively pay $34 million to fund the statewide secretary of state campaigns in 2014 and 2018.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/capitolandcalifornia/story/2313314.html" target="_blank"><strong>Read Article</strong></a></p>
<div style='clear:both'></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lobbyingfirms.com/california-lobbyists-file-lawsuit-to-stop-vote-on-proposed-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
